United States v. Raymond Twine
This text of 362 F.3d 1163 (United States v. Raymond Twine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AMENDED ORDER
This amended Order supercedes the non-published Order filed February 24, 2004.
An active Judge sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this case en banc, and the full court was advised of the sua sponte request. The parties submitted supplemental briefing advising the court of the merits of rehearing the case en banc, and Appellee, in its brief, requested rehearing en banc. The sua sponte request for a vote was then withdrawn. No other Judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 35. Rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
362 F.3d 1163, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5704, 2004 WL 595084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-raymond-twine-ca9-2004.