United States v. Raymond Twine

362 F.3d 1163, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5704, 2004 WL 595084
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 26, 2004·No. 03-10393·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

AMENDED ORDER

This amended Order supercedes the non-published Order filed February 24, 2004.

An active Judge sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this case en banc, and the full court was advised of the sua sponte request. The parties submitted supplemental briefing advising the court of the merits of rehearing the case en banc, and Appellee, in its brief, requested rehearing en banc. The sua sponte request for a vote was then withdrawn. No other Judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 35. Rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Raymond Twine, 362 F.3d 1163, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5704, 2004 WL 595084 (9th Cir. 2004).

362 F.3d 1163 (United States v. Raymond Twine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Montoya
486 F. Supp. 2d 996 (D. Arizona, 2007)