United States v. Raymond Toby Apadaca and Danny Ray Combs

429 F.2d 39, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5703
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 14, 1970
Docket28695_1
StatusPublished

This text of 429 F.2d 39 (United States v. Raymond Toby Apadaca and Danny Ray Combs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Raymond Toby Apadaca and Danny Ray Combs, 429 F.2d 39, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5703 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing.

A jury convicted these appellants, Raymond Toby Apadaca and Danny Ray Combs, of transporting a stolen automobile in interstate commerce from Hattiesburg, Mississippi, to Panama City, Florida, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. We affirm.

Court appointed counsel has diligently raised every possible contention of error in an effort to assist his clients. His industry, however, cannot cure a hopeless case. The trial record unmistakably establishes the guilt of the appellants, as charged, and the legal errors sought to be raised, although sincerely urged, do not justify discussion in a protracted opinion.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 F.2d 39, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 5703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-raymond-toby-apadaca-and-danny-ray-combs-ca5-1970.