United States v. Raymond Nottingham, Jr.

828 F.2d 18, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11130, 1987 WL 44595
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 19, 1987
Docket86-7221
StatusUnpublished

This text of 828 F.2d 18 (United States v. Raymond Nottingham, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Raymond Nottingham, Jr., 828 F.2d 18, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11130, 1987 WL 44595 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

828 F.2d 18
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Raymond NOTTINGHAM, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86-7221

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted January 20, 1987.
Decided August 19, 1987.

Raymond Nottingham, Jr., appellant pro se.

Tommy Eugene Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Nottingham appeals from the district court's denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) 'Motion for Reconsideration.' No aspect of the district court's initial judgment is before us for review. We can reverse the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion only if the denial amounts to an abuse of discretion. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). We find no abuse of discretion, and affirm.

We dispense with oral argument because it would not significantly aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Michael D. Williams
674 F.2d 310 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)
In Re Swanner
828 F.2d 18 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
828 F.2d 18, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11130, 1987 WL 44595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-raymond-nottingham-jr-ca4-1987.