United States v. Raymond Melvin Neverdal

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Raymond Melvin Neverdal

943 F.2d 56, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25648, 1991 WL 180266

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 13, 1991

Docket91-30008

StatusUnpublished

This text of 943 F.2d 56 (United States v. Raymond Melvin Neverdal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Raymond Melvin Neverdal, 943 F.2d 56, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25648, 1991 WL 180266 (9th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

943 F.2d 56

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Raymond Melvin NEVERDAL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-30008.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 11, 1991.*
Decided Sept. 13, 1991.

Before EUGENE WRIGHT, FARRIS and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Lovell in his Opinion and Order filed on November 20, 1990.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI