United States v. Raymond Leo Curbow, Sr.
This text of 755 F.2d 686 (United States v. Raymond Leo Curbow, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raymond Leo Curbow was convicted of stealing hogs which were a part of an interstate shipment of freight, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. He was sentenced to a term of three years under 18 U.S.C. § 4205(b)(2). Curbow’s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in permitting the government to inquire, on redirect examination, into matters beyond the scope of cross-examination. We find no *687 merit to the contention, and affirm pursuant to 8th Cir.R. 14(a). The redirect examination of the witness was sufficiently connected with the direct and cross-examination of the witness to be a proper matter of inquiry. United States v. Foley, 683 F.2d 273, 277 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1043, 103 S.Ct. 463, 74 L.Ed.2d 613 (1982).
Affirmed. See 8th Cir.R. 14(a).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
755 F.2d 686, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-raymond-leo-curbow-sr-ca8-1985.