United States v. Raymond Leech

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Raymond Leech

568 F. App'x 263

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2014·No. 13-7870·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Raymond 0. Leech appeals the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion, in which he attempted to collaterally challenge his criminal conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Leech, No. l:06-cr-00427-WDQ-2 (D.Md. Oct. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Raymond 0. Leech appeals the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion, in which he attempted to collaterally challenge his criminal conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Leech, No. l:06-cr-00427-WDQ-2 (D.Md. Oct. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Raymond Leech, 568 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

568 F. App'x 263 (United States v. Raymond Leech) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.