United States v. Raymond Joseph Denalli

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Raymond Joseph Denalli

90 F.3d 444, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18870, 1996 WL 400001

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedAugust 1, 1996

Docket94-3067

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 90 F.3d 444 (United States v. Raymond Joseph Denalli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Raymond Joseph Denalli, 90 F.3d 444, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18870, 1996 WL 400001 (11th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before HATCHETT and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for rehearing filed by the United States is GRANTED to the following extent:

The first full paragraph in the right hand column of 73 F.3d 328 is deleted and replaced by the following:

We easily conclude that the Federles’ private residence was not used in interstate or foreign commerce; therefore, this court must determine only if the residence was used in any activity affecting interstate or foreign commerce.

The first sentence of the paragraph on 73 F.3d at 330 labeled as [2] is deleted and replaced by the following:

[2] Lopez required the government to prove that Federles’ private residence was used in an activity that had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.

In all other respects the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI