United States v. Raymond Joseph Denalli
90 F.3d 444, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18870, 1996 WL 400001
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 1, 1996·No. 94-3067·Published·Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
The petition for rehearing filed by the United States is GRANTED to the following extent:
The first full paragraph in the right hand column of 73 F.3d 328 is deleted and replaced by the following:
We easily conclude that the Federles’ private residence was not used in interstate or foreign commerce; therefore, this court must determine only if the residence was used in any activity affecting interstate or foreign commerce.
The first sentence of the paragraph on 73 F.3d at 330 labeled as [2] is deleted and replaced by the following:
[2] Lopez required the government to prove that Federles’ private residence was used in an activity that had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
In all other respects the petition for rehearing is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Raymond Joseph Denalli, 90 F.3d 444, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18870, 1996 WL 400001 (11th Cir. 1996).
90 F.3d 444 (United States v. Raymond Joseph Denalli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Richard Morrison
218 F. App'x 933 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Raymond Joseph Denalli
179 F. App'x 605 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Shivers
390 F. Supp. 2d 1067 (N.D. Florida, 2005)
United States v. Jay Scott Ballinger
395 F.3d 1218 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Ballinger
312 F.3d 1264 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Dewey J. Jones
178 F.3d 479 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Barry Kaplan
171 F.3d 1351 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Christopher Dascenzo A.K.A. Christopher Marcus Dascenzo
152 F.3d 1300 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Viscome
144 F.3d 1365 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
Belflower v. United States
129 F.3d 1459 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Bramlett
116 F.3d 1403 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Olga Gaydos
108 F.3d 505 (Third Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Chisholm
105 F.3d 1357 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Joey J. Hicks
106 F.3d 187 (Seventh Circuit, 1997)