United States v. Raymond Gill

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6781 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6781

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAYMOND EDWARD GILL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:81-cr-00105-GLR-1)

Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Edward Gill, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6781 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Edward Gill filed a notice of appeal in the underlying criminal action after

filing a self-styled “Motion to Amend Original Writ of Error Coram Nobis” (“Motion to

Amend”). The Government has filed a motion to dismiss, asserting, in part, that the district

court has not yet ruled on the Motion to Amend. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541,

545-46 (1949). Review of the district court docket confirms that the Motion to Amend

remains pending in the district court. Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion and

dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED