United States v. Raymond Edward Davis
353 F.2d 739
Opinion
This appeal is from the District Court’s denial of a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Neither the asserted discrepancy in the testimony nor the allegedly new evidence is of sufficient materiality or weight to warrant our saying that the District Court abused its discretion. We find no error; the appeal is frivolous.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Raymond Edward Davis, 353 F.2d 739 (4th Cir. 1965).
353 F.2d 739 (United States v. Raymond Edward Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.