United States v. Raymond C. Johnson

649 F.2d 368, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11766
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 2, 1981·No. 80-3821·Published

Opinion

*369 PER CURIAM:

The proof of the F.D.I.C. insured status of the bank was sparse as, unfortunately, it too often is. See United States v. Maner, 611 F.2d 107, (5th Cir. 1980).

Nevertheless it was sufficient to sustain the guilty verdict and conviction. The other asserted errors relating to the admissibility or adequacy of the proof to show violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1014 are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Raymond C. Johnson, 649 F.2d 368, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11766 (5th Cir. 1981).

649 F.2d 368 (United States v. Raymond C. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Grady James Maner
611 F.2d 107 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)