United States v. Raymond C. Johnson

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Raymond C. Johnson

649 F.2d 368, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11766

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJuly 2, 1981

Docket80-3821

StatusPublished

This text of 649 F.2d 368 (United States v. Raymond C. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Raymond C. Johnson, 649 F.2d 368, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11766 (5th Cir. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

*369 PER CURIAM:

The proof of the F.D.I.C. insured status of the bank was sparse as, unfortunately, it too often is. See United States v. Maner, 611 F.2d 107, (5th Cir. 1980).

Nevertheless it was sufficient to sustain the guilty verdict and conviction. The other asserted errors relating to the admissibility or adequacy of the proof to show violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1014 are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*369 PER CURIAM:

The proof of the F.D.I.C. insured status of the bank was sparse as, unfortunately, it too often is. See United States v. Maner, 611 F.2d 107, (5th Cir. 1980).

Nevertheless it was sufficient to sustain the guilty verdict and conviction. The other asserted errors relating to the admissibility or adequacy of the proof to show violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1014 are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

649 F.2d 368, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 11766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-raymond-c-johnson-ca5-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack