United States v. Ray Short

667 F. App'x 928
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 2, 2016
Docket15-30224
StatusUnpublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 928 (United States v. Ray Short) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ray Short, 667 F. App'x 928 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ray Short appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 180- *929 month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted sexual exploitation of a minor child, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Short contends that his mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years violates the Eighth Amendment because it is cruel and unusual punishment. He argues that, given his age, poor health, and life expectancy, the 15-year sentence is effectively a life sentence, which is disproportionate to his offense. We review de novo. See United States v. Shill, 740 F.3d 1347, 1355 (9th Cir. 2014). Short’s contention lacks merit because the sentence is not grossly disproportionate to the conduct underlying the offense. See id. (a sentence violates the Eighth Amendment when it is grossly disproportionate to the crime).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Randy Shill
740 F.3d 1347 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ray-short-ca9-2016.