United States v. Ray Reha
This text of 56 F. App'x 296 (United States v. Ray Reha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ray Reha plead guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1) (2000), and 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and to forfeiture of drug proceeds under 21 U.S.C. § 853 (2000). At sentencing, the District Court 1 denied Reha’s motion for a downward departure, which was based upon extraordinary physical impairment, and sentenced him to 151 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release.
Reha appeals, arguing the District Court abused its discretion in denying his mo *297 tion. We will not review the District Court’s refusal to depart, however, because the Court stated that it was aware of its authority to depart but declined to do so in this case. See United States v. Or-ozco-Rodriguez, 220 F.3d 940, 942 (8th Cir.2000). Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ray-reha-ca8-2003.