United States v. Ray Correa-Negron
This text of 448 F.2d 790 (United States v. Ray Correa-Negron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
448 F.2d 790
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ray CORREA-NEGRON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-2109.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 11, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Gordon Thompson, Jr., Judge.
Alan Saltzman, of Saltzman & Goldin, Hollywood, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Stephen G. Nelson, Acting Chief, Crim. Div., Shelby R. Gott, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges, and BATTIN,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is reversed. We find on this record that this defendant was not adequately advised of the consequences of a waiver of the right to confrontation of witnesses.
Notes:
The Honorable James F. Battin, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 F.2d 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ray-correa-negron-ca9-1971.