United States v. Ray Correa-Negron

448 F.2d 790
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ray Correa-Negron. Read the opinion of the Court — 462 F.2d 613
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 11, 1971·No. 71-2109_1·Published

Opinion

448 F.2d 790

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ray CORREA-NEGRON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2109.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 11, 1971.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Gordon Thompson, Jr., Judge.

Alan Saltzman, of Saltzman & Goldin, Hollywood, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Stephen G. Nelson, Acting Chief, Crim. Div., Shelby R. Gott, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges, and BATTIN,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is reversed. We find on this record that this defendant was not adequately advised of the consequences of a waiver of the right to confrontation of witnesses.

Notes:

*

The Honorable James F. Battin, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ray Correa-Negron, 448 F.2d 790 (9th Cir. 1971).

448 F.2d 790 (United States v. Ray Correa-Negron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.