United States v. Ray Carlisle

18 F.3d 752, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1710, 94 Daily Journal DAR 3047, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4013
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 1994
Docket04-55028
StatusPublished

This text of 18 F.3d 752 (United States v. Ray Carlisle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ray Carlisle, 18 F.3d 752, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1710, 94 Daily Journal DAR 3047, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4013 (9th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

18 F.3d 752

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ray CARLISLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-10582.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

March 8, 1994.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before: GOODWIN, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to a writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court has vacated this court's disposition of this case --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 872, 127 L.Ed.2d 70 and remanded it for further consideration in light of Ratzlaf v. United States, 510 U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994).

Upon due consideration, the Memorandum disposition filed June 22, 1992, is withdrawn and the judgment of the district court is reversed. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ratzlaf v. United States
510 U.S. 135 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Carlisle v. United States
510 U.S. 1068 (Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F.3d 752, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1710, 94 Daily Journal DAR 3047, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ray-carlisle-ca9-1994.