United States v. Ray

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8445

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL R. RAY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:02-cr-00687-TLW-1)

Submitted: April 29, 2009 Decided: May 13, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael R. Ray, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael R. Ray appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motions to amend his restitution order and for

reconsideration of the district court’s denial of his motion to

amend his restitution order. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s orders. United States v. Ray, No. 4:02-cr-00687-TLW-1

(D.S.C. Apr. 22, 2008; Nov. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED