United States v. Ray

48 F.3d 1218, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10960, 1995 WL 106193
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 16, 1995·No. 94-7046·Published

Opinion

48 F.3d 1218
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dailon Lee Grant RAY, a/k/a Dailon Leegrant Buddy Ray, a/k/a
Dailon Leegrant Ray, a/k/a Dailon L. Buddy Ray,
a/k/a Dailon Legrand Ray, a/k/a Dailon
Legrant Ray, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-7046.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 16, 1995.

Dailon Lee Grant Ray, Appellant Pro Se.

Barbara Dickerson Kocher, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his motion for reduction of sentence. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ray, Nos. CR-87-25; CA-93-82 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ray, 48 F.3d 1218, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10960, 1995 WL 106193 (4th Cir. 1995).

48 F.3d 1218 (United States v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.