United States v. Ravara

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania

United States v. Ravara

27 F. Cas. 714, 2 Dall. 299

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1794·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THE COURT

were of opinion in the charge, that the offence was indictable, and that the defendant was not privileged from prosecution in virtue of his consular appointment. The jury, after a short consultation, pronounced the defendant guilty; but he was after-wards pardoned, on condition (as I have heard) that he surrendered his commission and exe-quatur.

As to the question of jurisdiction, see U. S. v. Worral [Case No. 16,766].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

were of opinion in the charge, that the offence was indictable, and that the defendant was not privileged from prosecution in virtue of his consular appointment. The jury, after a short consultation, pronounced the defendant guilty; but he was after-wards pardoned, on condition (as I have heard) that he surrendered his commission and exe-quatur.

As to the question of jurisdiction, see U. S. v. Worral [Case No. 16,766].

United States v. Ravara, 27 F. Cas. 714, 2 Dall. 299 (circtdpa 1794).

Pincite

27 F. Cas. 714 (United States v. Ravara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related