United States v. Raul Saucedo, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 21, 2017
Docket15-41701
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Raul Saucedo, Jr. (United States v. Raul Saucedo, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Raul Saucedo, Jr., (5th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Case: 15-41701 Document: 00513882577 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41701 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED February 21, 2017 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL SAUCEDO, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15-CR-4-3

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Raul Saucedo, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Saucedo has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Saucedo’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 15-41701 Document: 00513882577 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

No. 15-41701

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Raul Saucedo, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-raul-saucedo-jr-ca5-2017.