United States v. Raul Ruben Medina

543 F.2d 553
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 6, 1976·No. 76-2152·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The search of appellant’s vehicle took place at the Sarita checkpoint which was the subject of Sifuentes v. United States, affirmed sub nom., United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976). The officer had probable cause to search the car after appellant ran the checkpoint, after his car interior smelled of air freshener, and after he denied having a key to the trunk. See United States v. Torres, 537 F.2d 1299, 5 Cir. 1976. The judgment of the district court finding appellant guilty of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Raul Ruben Medina, 543 F.2d 553 (5th Cir. 1976).

543 F.2d 553 (United States v. Raul Ruben Medina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Moreno-Vargas
315 F.3d 489 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
State v. Guzman
879 P.2d 114 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1994)
United States v. Sharon Lanelle Martinez
808 F.2d 1050 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
United States v. Oyarzun
582 F. Supp. 121 (W.D. Texas, 1984)
United States v. Jerry Lee Head
693 F.2d 353 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
United States v. Albert Strong
552 F.2d 138 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
United States v. David Reyna
546 F.2d 103 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Roberto MacIas and Raul MacIas
546 F.2d 58 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)