United States v. Raul Ramos

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Raul Ramos

634 F. App'x 979

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2016·No. 15-40852·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Raul Baldomero Ramos raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. The motion for summary disposition is *980 GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Raul Baldomero Ramos raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. The motion for summary disposition is *980 GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Raul Ramos, 634 F. App'x 979 (5th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

634 F. App'x 979 (United States v. Raul Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related