United States v. Raul Ramirez

444 F. App'x 114

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: July 19, 2011
• Docket: 10-10329
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Raul Ramirez appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(g) motion to return $4,527 seized from him on May 4, 1999. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ramirez contends that the district court erred in dismissing his Rule 41(g) motion as barred by the statute of limitations. The district court did not clearly err in finding that Ramirez’s motion was filed on May 8, 2008, and the motion was therefore untimely. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a).

AFFIRMED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.