United States v. Raul Ortuno-Higareda
This text of 479 F.3d 1153 (United States v. Raul Ortuno-Higareda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
479 F.3d 1153
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Raul ORTUNO-HIGAREDA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-10257.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 16, 2007.
Lynnette C. Kimmins, USTU—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. Deconcini, Nathan D. Leonardo, Esq., Leonardo & Roach, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Francisco Leon, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Circuit Judge, J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, STEPHEN REINHARDT, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, PAMELA ANN RYMER, MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, SIDNEY R. THOMAS, BARRY G. SILVERMAN, SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM McLANE WARDLAW, RAYMOND C. FISHER, RICHARD A. PAEZ, MARSHA S. BERZON, RICHARD C. TALLMAN, and JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
In light of the information furnished to us by the parties in response to our order of March 13, 2007, the appeal is dismissed as moot. The three-judge panel opinion, published at 450 F.3d 406 (9th Cir.2006), is vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
479 F.3d 1153, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 6056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-raul-ortuno-higareda-ca9-2007.