United States v. Rasheem

124 F. App'x 701
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 24, 2005
DocketDocket No. 04-2047-CR
StatusPublished

This text of 124 F. App'x 701 (United States v. Rasheem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rasheem, 124 F. App'x 701 (2d Cir. 2005).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-appellant Hassan Rasheem (“appellant”) appeals from a judgment entered on April 18, 2004, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Platt, J.) sentencing him to 96 months’ imprisonment for illegal firearm possession in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Relying on Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), appellant contends that the sentencing violated his Sixth Amendment rights.

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and this Court’s decision in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.2005), we remand to the district court for further proceedings in conformity with Crosby.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Jerome Crosby
397 F.3d 103 (Second Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 F. App'x 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rasheem-ca2-2005.