United States v. Rashaad
This text of 634 F. App'x 942 (United States v. Rashaad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[943]*943Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Hassaan Haakim Rashaad appeals the district court’s order denying Rashaad’s motion for clarification of the schedule of restitution payments set forth in his 2002 criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error; Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Rashaad, No. 3:01-cr-00195-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
634 F. App'x 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rashaad-ca4-2016.