United States v. Rashaad

634 F. App'x 942
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 1, 2016·No. No. 15-7515·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[943] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hassaan Haakim Rashaad appeals the district court’s order denying Rashaad’s motion for clarification of the schedule of restitution payments set forth in his 2002 criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error; Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Rashaad, No. 3:01-cr-00195-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rashaad, 634 F. App'x 942 (4th Cir. 2016).

634 F. App'x 942 (United States v. Rashaad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rashaad v. United States
W.D. North Carolina, 2020