United States v. Rashaad

81 F. App'x 447
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rashaad. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 F. App'x 509
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 20, 2003·No. No. 03-7409·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Hassaan Haakim Rashaad appeals the district court’s order denying Rashaad’s motion for production of transcripts at Government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Rashaad, No. CR-01-195 (W.D.N.C. filed Aug. 18, 2003 & entered Aug. 19, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rashaad, 81 F. App'x 447 (4th Cir. 2003).

81 F. App'x 447 (United States v. Rashaad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.