United States v. Raquel Grijalva

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Raquel Grijalva

436 F.2d 420

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 26, 1971

Docket26154_1

StatusPublished

This text of 436 F.2d 420 (United States v. Raquel Grijalva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Raquel Grijalva, 436 F.2d 420 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Raquel Grijalva, appeals from her conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 111 (assaulting a federal officer) .

The only point on appeal that requires comment is her contention that evidence admitted against her, over objection, was the product of an illegal search and seizure. Despite the able and ingenious arguments of counsel, we think the search in this case fell within the bounds of Warden v. Hayden (1967) 387 U.S. 294, 87 S.Ct. 1642, 18 L.Ed.2d 782 and thus did not run athwart her Fourth Amendment rights.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Raquel Grijalva, appeals from her conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 111 (assaulting a federal officer) .

The only point on appeal that requires comment is her contention that evidence admitted against her, over objection, was the product of an illegal search and seizure. Despite the able and ingenious arguments of counsel, we think the search in this case fell within the bounds of Warden v. Hayden (1967) 387 U.S. 294, 87 S.Ct. 1642, 18 L.Ed.2d 782 and thus did not run athwart her Fourth Amendment rights.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

436 F.2d 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-raquel-grijalva-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack