United States v. Raphael Mendez

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Raphael Mendez

565 F. App'x 261

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 9, 2014

Docket14-6009

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 565 F. App'x 261 (United States v. Raphael Mendez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Raphael Mendez, 565 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

*262 PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez appeals a district court order granting the Government’s motion to reconsider the order granting a hearing under 18 U.S.C. § 4247(h) (2012) and vacating the order scheduling the hearing. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mendez, No. 5:91-hc-00350-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2013) (unpublished). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*262 PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez appeals a district court order granting the Government’s motion to reconsider the order granting a hearing under 18 U.S.C. § 4247(h) (2012) and vacating the order scheduling the hearing. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mendez, No. 5:91-hc-00350-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2013) (unpublished). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

565 F. App'x 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-raphael-mendez-ca4-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack