United States v. Rankin
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ; Plaintiff, i v. ; Crim. No. 11-cr-366 (JDB/GMH) SAMUEL RANKIN, ; F I L E D Defendant. 3 JUN 15 2015
Clerk, u.s. District 8. Bankruptcy Courts tor the District of Columbla
CONSENT TO MODIFY SUPERVISED RELEASE The parties agree the defendant’s conditions of supervised release should be modified and
being no objection thereto, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Mr. Rankin’s conditions of supervised release are modified as follows: Mr. Rankin shall be held without bond at the DC. Jail
or the Correctional Treatment Facility until a bed space becomes available at the Montgomery
County Residential Re—entry Center (“MCRRC”). Mr. Rankin shall then be TRANSFERRED via a bed~to—bed transfer by the United States Probation Office to MCRRC, where he shall reside for up to 180 days from admission, or until release by the United States Probation Officer Mr. Rankin shall
abide by all policies and procedures of the facility. Payments for subsistence are waived. While at MCRRC, Mr. Rankin shall be released only for visits with his legal counsel, religious services, and to attend an intensive drug treatment program. Mr. Rankin is further ordered to attend and complete
an intensive drug treatment program, as directed by the United States Pr bation Office.
Dated:
GtZ/S’
United States Magistrate Judge
The Magistrate judge having recommended that the conditions of Mr. Rankin’s supervised release be modified and there being no objection thereto, IT IS ORDERED that the
recommendation of the Magistratejudge is accepted.
Dated: 6/197/J’ (KL M
ohn D. Bates United States Districtjudge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Rankin (United States v. Rankin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.