United States v. Rangel
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50043 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARMELO RANGEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-99-CR-544(1) -------------------- June 15, 2000
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appointed counsel for Carmelo Rangel has filed a motion to
withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Rangel has received a copy of counsel’s
motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent
review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Rangel (United States v. Rangel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.