United States v. Rangel

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rangel. Read the opinion of the Court — 319 F.3d 710
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2000·No. 00-50043·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50043 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARMELO RANGEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-99-CR-544(1) -------------------- June 15, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appointed counsel for Carmelo Rangel has filed a motion to

withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Rangel has received a copy of counsel’s

motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent

review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rangel, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Rangel (United States v. Rangel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)