United States v. Randy Neece

466 F. App'x 386

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Randy Neece raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir.1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir.2006), which held that a district court has the discretion to order a federal sentence to run consecutively to a yet-to-be-imposed state sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3584. See Setser v. United States ,—U.S.—132 S.Ct. 1463, 1466-74, 182 L.Ed.2d 455 (2012). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.