United States v. Randy Fink

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Randy Fink

89 F. App'x 594

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2004·No. 03-3369·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Randy Fink appeals his commitment under 18 U.S.C. § 4245, and we grant him leave to do so in forma pauperis. After careful review, we affirm the district court’s 1 order, entered after a hearing, *595 because the finding that Fink suffers from a mental disease or defect for which he requires treatment in a suitable facility is not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Eckerson, 299 F.3d 913, 914-15 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

1

. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable James C. Eng *595 land, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Randy Fink appeals his commitment under 18 U.S.C. § 4245, and we grant him leave to do so in forma pauperis. After careful review, we affirm the district court’s 1 order, entered after a hearing, *595 because the finding that Fink suffers from a mental disease or defect for which he requires treatment in a suitable facility is not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Eckerson, 299 F.3d 913, 914-15 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

1

. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable James C. Eng *595 land, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

United States v. Randy Fink, 89 F. App'x 594 (8th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

89 F. App'x 594 (United States v. Randy Fink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related