United States v. Randenbush

33 U.S. 288, 8 L. Ed. 948, 8 Pet. 288, 1834 U.S. LEXIS 587
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 11, 1834
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 33 U.S. 288 (United States v. Randenbush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Randenbush, 33 U.S. 288, 8 L. Ed. 948, 8 Pet. 288, 1834 U.S. LEXIS 587 (1834).

Opinion

*289 Mr Chief Justice Marshall

delivered the opinion of the Court,

The defendant was indicted in April 1833, in.the circuit court for the district of Pennsylvania, for passing a counterfeit note of the denomination of ten dollars, purporting to be a note of the Bank, of the United Slates, with intent to defraud the bank, &c.

He pleaded that the note described in the indictment had been heretofore given in evidence on the trial of the defendant, upon a former indictment found against him for passing another counterfeit ten dollar note, upon which indictment he had been acquitted.

The United States demurred to this plea, and the defendant joined in demurrer.

The judges were opposed in opinion, on the question whether the judgment on the demurrer should be entered in favour of the United States or of the prisoner, which division of *290 opinion is ordered to be certified to the supreme court of the United States.

The offence for which the defendant was indicted, and to which indictment he pleaded the plea of a former acquital, was entirely a distinct offence front that on which the verdict - of acquittal was found. The p’ea does not show t,hat he had ever been indicted for passing the same counterfeit bill, or that he had ever been put in jeopardy for the same offence. We are therefore of opinion, that the matter pleaded is no bar to the indictment, and that the demurrer ought to be sustained. A certificate to this effect is to be given.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Pennsylvania, and on the question and point on which the judges of the said circuit court were opposed in opinion, and which was certified to this court for its opinion, agreeably to the act of congress in such case made and provided, and was argued by counsel; on consideration whereof, it is the opinion of this court that judgment on the demurrer to the second plea pleaded by the defendant to the indictment filed against him, ought to be rendered for the United States. Whereupon, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that it be certified to the said circuit court that judgment on the demurrer to the second plea pleaded by the defendant to the indictment filed against him, ought to be rendered for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Selness
54 P.3d 1025 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2002)
State v. Hopkins
269 N.E.2d 595 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1971)
Thacker v. State
1957 OK CR 54 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1957)
Collins v. State
1940 OK CR 123 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1940)
Witters v. United States
106 F.2d 837 (D.C. Circuit, 1939)
State v. McIntyre
66 P.2d 879 (Utah Supreme Court, 1937)
Abarca v. Ortiz Toro
44 P.R. 641 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1933)
Woodman v. United States
30 F.2d 482 (Fifth Circuit, 1929)
Wingfield v. Commonwealth
246 S.W. 822 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)
State v. Healy
161 N.W. 590 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1917)
Watson v. State
66 A. 635 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1907)
Spears v. People
77 N.E. 112 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1906)
Bliss v. United States
105 F. 508 (First Circuit, 1900)
Bell v. State
57 Md. 108 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1881)
Bainbridge v. State
30 Ohio St. (N.S.) 264 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1876)
Curtis v. Whitney
80 U.S. 68 (Supreme Court, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 U.S. 288, 8 L. Ed. 948, 8 Pet. 288, 1834 U.S. LEXIS 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-randenbush-scotus-1834.