United States v. Ramos
This text of United States v. Ramos (United States v. Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and PENNIX Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Alejandro E. RAMOS Aviation Ordnanceman Airman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 202000021
Decided: 27 October 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Hayes C. Larsen
Sentence adjudged 26 September 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 12 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander R. Andrew Austria, JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a). United States v. Ramos, NMCCA No. 202000021 Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ramos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ramos-nmcca-2020.