United States v. Ramos

390 F. App'x 425
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 17, 2010·No. No. 09-10918·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent David Ramos has moved for leave to with[426] draw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ramos has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Ramos’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Ramos’s untimely request for appointment of new counsel on appeal is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ramos, 390 F. App'x 425 (5th Cir. 2010).

390 F. App'x 425 (United States v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jesus Alvarez
670 F. App'x 881 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)