United States v. Ramos

203 F. App'x 661
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ramos. Read the opinion of the Court — 537 F.3d 439
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2006·No. 05-51172·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Jon Phillip Ramos on appeal from the revocation of his term of supervised release has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as is required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ramos has not responded to counsel’s motion.

Our independent review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ramos, 203 F. App'x 661 (5th Cir. 2006).

203 F. App'x 661 (United States v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)