United States v. Ramos

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ramos. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 F. App'x 334
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 30, 2001·No. 01-40067·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40067 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MANUEL SILVERIO RAMOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-345-1 -------------------- October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose

Manuel Silverio Ramos on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw

as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramos has not filed a response

to counsel's motion and brief.

Our independent review of the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-40067 -2-

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R.

42.2.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ramos, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Ramos (United States v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)