United States v. Ramon Robles

First Circuit

United States v. Ramon Robles

70 F.3d 1253, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 38818, 1995 WL 697315

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 1995

Docket95-1087

StatusUnpublished

This text of 70 F.3d 1253 (United States v. Ramon Robles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Ramon Robles, 70 F.3d 1253, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 38818, 1995 WL 697315 (1st Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

70 F.3d 1253

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
Cesar Ramon ROBLES, Defendant, Appellant.

No. 95-1087.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1995.

Joel D. Landry on brief for appellant.

Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, and Zechariah Chafee, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, SELYA and CYR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, Cesar Roman Robles challenges the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss his indictment for having illegally reentered this country after having been deported. See 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326. We affirm essentially for the reasons given in the district court's order, finding Robles' appellate arguments to be without merit. See Loc. R. 27.1.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI