United States v. Ramon E. Falu
This text of 421 F.2d 687 (United States v. Ramon E. Falu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Ramon E. FALU, Appellant.
No. 367, Docket 33954.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 17, 1969.
Decided Dec. 18, 1969.
Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, Ross Sandler and Arthur A. Munisteri, Asst. U.S. Attys., on the brief, for appellee.
Ramon E. Falu, pro se.
Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm Judge Cooper's denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of Falu's petition under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate his sentence for breaking into mail boxes in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1708, on the ground that he was under the influence of drugs at the times of plea and sentence. Judge Tyler had exercised great care in taking the plea; Falu admitted that there was a factual basis for this and specifically declared that he was not sick. Four weeks, during which he received no narcotic or addicting drugs, elapsed between plea and sentence, before Judge Cooper, at which Falu declined to exercise his right of allocution. On both occasions he was represented by highly experienced and capable counsel.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
421 F.2d 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ramon-e-falu-ca2-1969.