United States v. Ramirez-Tercero
This text of United States v. Ramirez-Tercero (United States v. Ramirez-Tercero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 8, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-51160 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
GABRIEL RAMIREZ-TERCERO, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-02-CR-122-2 --------------------
Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Gabriel Ramirez-Tercero has
moved for leave to withdraw from this direct appeal and has filed
a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Ramirez has responded after receiving a copy of counsel’s motion
and brief. He has not raised any appellate claims, but seeks
appointment of new counsel to continue his case.
Ramirez’s motion for new counsel is DENIED. Our independent
review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue in this appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-51160 -2-
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ramirez-Tercero, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ramirez-tercero-ca5-2004.