United States v. Ramirez-Mendoza

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 18, 2004
Docket03-41107
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Ramirez-Mendoza (United States v. Ramirez-Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ramirez-Mendoza, (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41107 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR RAMIREZ-MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-150-1 --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar

Ramirez-Mendoza (Ramirez) has moved for leave to withdraw from

this direct appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramirez has received a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and the record disclose no

nonfrivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-41107 -2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Ramirez-Mendoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ramirez-mendoza-ca5-2004.