United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 10, 2002·No. 02-10497·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10497 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS RAMIREZ-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:01-CR-72-1 - - - - - - - - - - October 9, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender representing Carlos Ramirez-

Hernandez has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed

a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Ramirez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-10497 -2-

excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez (United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)