United States v. Ramirez-Camacho
This text of 117 F. App'x 576 (United States v. Ramirez-Camacho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Salvador Ramirez-Camacho appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of unlawful reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Ramirez-Camacho contends that the district court abused its discretion by departing two levels rather than the requested eight levels. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s discretionary decision as to the extent of the downward departure. United States v. Vizcarra-Angulo, 904 F.2d 22, 23 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that a district court’s decision in fixing the extent of a downward departure is not reviewable). See also United States v. Linn, 362 F.3d 1261 (9th Cir.2004) (holding that the PROTECT Act did not mandate review of discretionary denials of downward departures).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 F. App'x 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ramirez-camacho-ca9-2004.