United States v. Ramirez

225 F. App'x 268
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ramirez. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 F. App'x 915
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 18, 2007·No. 06-20085·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Velia Najera Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction of illegal use of a communication facility, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). Najera Ramirez’s sole issue on appeal is that the district court erred by ordering her to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on direct appeal. See United States v. Carmichael, 343 F.3d 756, 761-62 (5th Cir. 2003). Najera Ramirez concedes that this issue is foreclosed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ramirez, 225 F. App'x 268 (5th Cir. 2007).

225 F. App'x 268 (United States v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Carmichael
343 F.3d 756 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)