United States v. Ramirez
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-21081 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
JOEL RAMIREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-26 --------------------
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joel
Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Ramirez has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ramirez (United States v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.