United States v. Ramirez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ramirez. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 F. App'x 915
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2006·No. 05-21081·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-21081 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

JOEL RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-26 --------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joel

Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Ramirez has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ramirez, (5th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Ramirez (United States v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)