United States v. Ramirez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ramirez. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 F.3d 318
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 23, 2002·No. 01-11480·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11480 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ALFONSO RAMIREZ, also known as Pepe,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CR-41-1-C -------------------- August 21, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Alfonso Ramirez appeals his guilty-plea convictions and

sentences for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to

distribute, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, and

distribution of cocaine. He contends that 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(b)(1)(A) and (B) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi

v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). As Ramirez concedes, his

argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent, but he raises the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-11480 -2-

issue to preserve it for Supreme Court review. See United States

v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied,

532 U.S. 1045 (2001). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ramirez, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Ramirez (United States v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)