United States v. Ramirez

174 F. App'x 530
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 2006
DocketNo. 04-16518; D.C. Docket No. 04-00077-CR-T-26-MSS
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 F. App'x 530 (United States v. Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ramirez, 174 F. App'x 530 (11th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The jurisdictional issue raised by appellants is foreclosed by our recent opinion in United States v. De La Cruz, 443 F.3d 830 (11th Cir.2006). The other arguments of appellants challenging their convictions are rejected without need for further discussion.

Pursuant to the concession by the government, the sentences of all five appellants are vacated, and each is remanded for resentencing.

AFFIRMED as to the convictions; VACATED AND REMANDED as to the sentences.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Manuel Ramirez Garzon
223 F. App'x 899 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 F. App'x 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ramirez-ca11-2006.