United States v. Ramirez

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Ramirez

174 F. App'x 530

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 5, 2006·No. No. 04-16518; D.C. Docket No. 04-00077-CR-T-26-MSS·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The jurisdictional issue raised by appellants is foreclosed by our recent opinion in United States v. De La Cruz, 443 F.3d 830 (11th Cir.2006). The other arguments of appellants challenging their convictions are rejected without need for further discussion.

Pursuant to the concession by the government, the sentences of all five appellants are vacated, and each is remanded for resentencing.

AFFIRMED as to the convictions; VACATED AND REMANDED as to the sentences.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The jurisdictional issue raised by appellants is foreclosed by our recent opinion in United States v. De La Cruz, 443 F.3d 830 (11th Cir.2006). The other arguments of appellants challenging their convictions are rejected without need for further discussion.

Pursuant to the concession by the government, the sentences of all five appellants are vacated, and each is remanded for resentencing.

AFFIRMED as to the convictions; VACATED AND REMANDED as to the sentences.

United States v. Ramirez, 174 F. App'x 530 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

174 F. App'x 530 (United States v. Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related