United States v. Ramirez-Acoltzi
This text of 407 F. App'x 211 (United States v. Ramirez-Acoltzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Moises Ramirez-Acoltzi appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and the sentence imposed upon his revocation.
Ramirez-Acoltzi contends that the supervised release revocation procedures set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) violate Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 [212]*212S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). As Ramirez-Acoltzi concedes, this contention is foreclosed by United States v. Santana, 526 F.3d 1257, 1262 (9th Cir.2008), and he raises it only to preserve the issue for further review.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 F. App'x 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ramirez-acoltzi-ca9-2010.