United States v. Ralph Thompson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 20, 2000
Docket99-2963
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Ralph Thompson (United States v. Ralph Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ralph Thompson, (8th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 99-2963 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Ralph Thompson, also known as * Travell L. Glover, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Fabias L. Shipman, * * Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: June 9, 2000 Filed: July 20, 2000 ___________

Before McMILLIAN, BRIGHT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Ralph Thompson pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Following imposition of sentence, appointed counsel moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Upon review of the record and the parties& briefs, we agree with the government that the district court&s failure at the change-of-plea hearing to advise Thompson of the correct statutory mandatory minimum sentence for his offense, and of the applicability and effect of the period of supervised release he faced, was harmless error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1), (h); United States v. Prado, 204 F.3d 843, 846 (8th Cir. 2000); United States v. McCarthy, 97 F.3d 1562, 1575 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1130, and 520 U.S. 1133 (1997); United States v. Osment, 13 F.3d 1240, 1242-43 (8th Cir. 1994).

Having reviewed the record, we conclude that no other non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel&s motion to withdraw.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. James Edward Osment
13 F.3d 1240 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Arnold Prado
204 F.3d 843 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Ralph Thompson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ralph-thompson-ca8-2000.