United States v. Ralph Michael Lepiscopo

409 F.2d 843, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12780
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 16, 1969·No. 26868_1·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I [dated March 11, 1969].

The Judgment of the District Court is reversed. The case is remanded for a new trial in light of Blake v. United States, (5 Cir., 1969) 407 F.2d 908 (en banc).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ralph Michael Lepiscopo, 409 F.2d 843, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12780 (5th Cir. 1969).

409 F.2d 843 (United States v. Ralph Michael Lepiscopo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ralph Michael Lepiscopo v. United States
469 F.2d 650 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Michael Hawkins
425 F.2d 252 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Johnny Ray Smith
423 F.2d 1357 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Tsoi Kwan Sang
416 F.2d 306 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Stiles R. Davis v. United States
413 F.2d 1226 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
United States v. Stiles Richard Davis
411 F.2d 570 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)