United States v. Ralph Michael Lepiscopo
Opinion
Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I [dated March 11, 1969].
The Judgment of the District Court is reversed. The case is remanded for a new trial in light of Blake v. United States, (5 Cir., 1969) 407 F.2d 908 (en banc).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
409 F.2d 843 (United States v. Ralph Michael Lepiscopo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.