United States v. Ralph Michael Lepiscopo

409 F.2d 843, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12780
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 16, 1969
Docket26868_1
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 409 F.2d 843 (United States v. Ralph Michael Lepiscopo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ralph Michael Lepiscopo, 409 F.2d 843, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12780 (5th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I [dated March 11, 1969].

The Judgment of the District Court is reversed. The case is remanded for a new trial in light of Blake v. United States, (5 Cir., 1969) 407 F.2d 908 (en banc).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ralph Michael Lepiscopo v. United States
469 F.2d 650 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Michael Hawkins
425 F.2d 252 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Johnny Ray Smith
423 F.2d 1357 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Tsoi Kwan Sang
416 F.2d 306 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Stiles R. Davis v. United States
413 F.2d 1226 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
United States v. Stiles Richard Davis
411 F.2d 570 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
409 F.2d 843, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ralph-michael-lepiscopo-ca5-1969.