United States v. Ralph Maddox

429 F. App'x 426
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 21, 2011
Docket10-11227
StatusUnpublished

This text of 429 F. App'x 426 (United States v. Ralph Maddox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ralph Maddox, 429 F. App'x 426 (5th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ralph Howard Maddox presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254 (5th Cir.2009), in which this court rejected constitutional challenges to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. See also United States v. Heth, 596 F.3d 255, 258-60 (5th Cir.2010).

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Whaley
577 F.3d 254 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Heth
596 F.3d 255 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 F. App'x 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ralph-maddox-ca5-2011.