United States v. Ralph Maddox

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Ralph Maddox

429 F. App'x 426

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2011·No. 10-11227·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ralph Howard Maddox presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254 (5th Cir.2009), in which this court rejected constitutional challenges to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. See also United States v. Heth, 596 F.3d 255, 258-60 (5th Cir.2010).

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ralph Howard Maddox presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254 (5th Cir.2009), in which this court rejected constitutional challenges to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. See also United States v. Heth, 596 F.3d 255, 258-60 (5th Cir.2010).

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Ralph Maddox, 429 F. App'x 426 (5th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

429 F. App'x 426 (United States v. Ralph Maddox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related